Legal Opinion
Bomar v. City of Baton Rouge
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 2, 1926No. 28112PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff claims to be the owner of lot 16, square. 18 of Roseland Terrace within the corporate limits of the city of Baton Rouge. The lot is the extreme southeast corner lot 'Of said square 18, and measures 120 feet north and south by 40 feet east and west.
The city admits the plaintiff’s ownership of the lot, except a space of some 20 feet, which is taken up by a street of said city which runs diagonally across said lot.
It is alleged that this street is a public street of said city and is a continuation of a public road running through the parish of East Baton Rouge into the city., and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawson v. Shreveport Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Torres v. FalgoustSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
- DeGrilleau v. FrawleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- City of Shreveport v. DrouinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
- McCearley v. LemennierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. New Orleans Term. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Jackson v. Town of LogansportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Wyatt v. HaglerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- B. F. Trappey's Sons, Inc. v. City of New IberiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.