Legal Opinion

Greene Process Metal Co. v. Washington Iron Works

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1936No. 7645PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s bill of complaint charged appellee with infringing a patent owned by appellant, and prayed for an injunction restraining further infringement thereof and for an accounting of profits and damages. Appellee’s answer pleaded invalidity of the patent and denied the alleged infringement. On final hearing, the District Court held the patent invalid for lack of invention and for lack of novelty and, accordingly, entered a decree dismissing the bill. This appeal is from that decree.

The patent in question was applied for by Albert E. Greene on January 2, 1909.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Market Street Cable Railway Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Locklin v. Switzer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Celite Corporation v. Dicalite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Goodman v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  4. Locklin v. Switzer BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Van Der Horst Corp. v. Chromium Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API