Legal Opinion

Bogan v. Wiley

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1946No. Civ. No. 12904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for specific performance of an oral contract to leave by will a one-half interest in a business partnership. The defendants had judgment and plaintiff’s appeal rests on the ground that defendants are es-topped to raise the defense of the statute of frauds.

Since no attack is directed to a claim that the evidence is insufficient to support any particular finding of fact a brief statement of facts resting on the findings made by the trial court will suffice. Mrs. Martha Wiley and her son James operated as equal partners a furniture business located in San Francisco. In 1914…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. De Mattos v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Bogan v. WileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Merrill v. DustmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API