Legal Opinion
Huber v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 2009No. D051669PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a local parish or the general church and its diocese own property held in the parish’s name, after the parish vestry and a majority of the congregants voted to disaffiliate the parish from the general church and affiliate with another church. After the parties completed their briefing, the California Supreme Court resolved the church property issue against a local parish in a case with facts substantively the same as those here. We are, of course, bound by that precedent. (Episcopal Church Cases (2009) 45 Cal.4th 467 [87…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSN. v. Maxwell-JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Diocese of San Joaquin v. GunnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Ronald F. v. State Department of Developmental ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Diocese of San Joaquin v. GunnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.