Legal Opinion
Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 18, 2015No. 2014-1396PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Pacing Technologies, LLC (Pacing) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Garmin International, Inc.’s and Garmin USA, Inc.’s (collectively, Garmin) accused products do not infringe the asserted claims of Pacing’s U.S. Patent No. 8,101,843. We affirm.
Background
The '843 patent is directed to methods and systems for pacing users during activities that involve repeated motions, such as running, cycling, and swimming. '843 patent col. 1II. 16-22. The preferred embodiment of the '843 patent describes a method for aiding a user’s pacing by providing the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Ultimatepointer, L.L.C. v. Nintendo Co LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Simo Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong Ucloudlink NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Straight Path Ip Group, Inc. v. Sipnet Eu S.R.O.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.