Legal Opinion
Hill-Rom Services, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 27, 2014No. 2013-1450PublishedCited by 282 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MOORE. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Hill-Rom Sendees, Inc., Hill-Rom Company, Inc., and Hill-Rom Manufacturing, Inc. (collectively, Hill-Rom) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation (collectively, Stryker) do not infringe asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,699,038 ('038 patent), 6,147,-592 ('592 patent), and 7,538,659 ('659 patent). Because the district court’s judgment of non-infringement was premised on erroneous claim…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by282 opinions
- Basf Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Poly-America, L.P. v. Api Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Mastermine Software, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Tomtom, Inc. v. AdolphCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Apple Inc. v. Wi-Lan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.