Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard, 06ca755 (5-31-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2007No. 06CA755PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a Pike County Common Pleas Court summary judgment in favor of Westfield Insurance Company, defendant below and appellee herein.

{¶ 2} Opal F. Howard, plaintiff below and appellant herein, raises the following assignments of error for review:

FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR:

"THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO ACCOUNT FOR THE FACT THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SPECIFICALLY DELETED THE FORMER ALLOWANCE AT 3937.18(K)(1-2) OF `INTRA-FAMILY' UM/UIM EXCLUSIONS."

SECOND ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR:

"THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE SUPREME COURT'S…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GraceOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Wertz v. Wertz, H-06-036 (9-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Calhoun v. Harner, 1-06-97 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Custer v. CusterOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Geico General Ins. Co. v. Van Meter, 07ca3002 (9-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API