United States v. Jesse Penn, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Jesse Nathahiel Pehn, Jr., was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). After opening statements at Penn’s trial, the District Court removed one of the jurors, a student with scheduled surgery, replacing him with an alternate. Penn now appeals, arguing that removing' the juror deprived Penn of his “constitutional rights to due process, fundamental fairness, equal protection and an impartial jury” because the juror substitution violated Rule 24(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because the‘District…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- John Wyeth & Brother Limited v. Cigna International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Rodriguez v. Municipality of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Wayne JamesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. BrooksDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- United States v. Abdur IslamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- PENN v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- United States v. Tommy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.