United States v. Brooks
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge
I. Introduction
A federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment against defendant Jamal Brooks ("Brooks") for possessing a firearm and ammunition while being a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (ECF No. 15.) Brooks filed a motion to dismiss1 arguing, among other things, that *57218 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to him because his disqualifying conviction, a misdemeanor conviction for carrying a firearm without a license in violation of 18 PA. CONS. STAT. § 6106(a)(2), was not for a serious offense.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Williams v. BarrDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Folajtar v. BarrDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019