Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Respondent Secretary of State appeals by leave granted the trial court order setting aside as arbitrary and capricious respondent’s declaratory ruling interpreting § 57 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.201 et seq. We reverse.
I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. THE PARTIES
1. THE SECRETARY OF STATE
The respondent-appellant in this matter is the Secretary of State (the Secretary). The position of Secretary of State is an elective office under the Michigan Constitution. See Const 1963, art 5, § 21. The Secretary is the single executive heading the Department of State (the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Tryc v Michigan Veterans’ FacilityMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. CameronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. HarversonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. LandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Niederhouse v. PalmertonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.