Dunham, Buckley & Co. v. Randall & Chambers Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from Tarranz, Tried below before Hon. S. P. Greene.
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
Defendants in error move to dismiss this writ of error because plaintiffs in error have voluntarily accepted the benefits of the judgment of which they complain.
The Randall & Chambers Company, a private trading corporation doing business in Fort Worth, made a conveyance of all its assets subject to execution to a trustee for the benefit of its creditors, giving preference to those named in class A (defendants in error) over those in class B (plaintiffs in error and various other creditors). Dunham, Buckley & Co., a nonresident firm, brought this suit in the nature…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erwin v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- O'Hara v. MacConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. DashielSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- McCreeliss's Distributees v. HinkleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Cravens v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- McKain v. MullenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Mesquite v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Montgomery v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Carle v. CarleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.