Legal Opinion
Rappaport v. Storfer Bros., Inc.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided March 2, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaer, J.
This case was tried before a jury which disagreed. The plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict was denied and this is a motion for reargument and for an order directing judgment for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff stored two fur coats with the defendant on April 18, 1952. One coat was returned but a natural wild mink coat valued by the plaintiff at $4,000, including excise and sales taxes, was stolen from defendant’s premises on May 9, 1952. The evidence shows that plaintiff left the mink coat for cleaning and storage in the cold storage vaults maintained on defendant’s premises. There is some…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murrary v. . Cunard Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Howard v. Handler Bros. & Winell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Kirkland v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Healy v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Klar v. H. & M. Parcel Room, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lerner v. BrettschneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Arkush v. CitronCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Waters v. Delaware Moving and Storage, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2023