Dixon v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Rogers v. Phila. & Reading Railroad Co., 263 Pa. 429.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
Husband and wife sued to recover for injury sustained by the wife in alighting from a train; the jury rendered a verdict for her; the court in banc granted defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. on the ground of her contributory negligence; she has appealed.
After the train stopped in the station at York, the porter placed the portable step-box in position below the car-steps to furnish continuous stepping facilities from the car platform to the station platform. According to plaintiff’s account, no one but the porter preceded her down the steps; the only passenger behind…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Young v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Twersky v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Murray v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Rogers v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Rogers v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hellriegel v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Butterman v. D. L. W. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Butterman v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940