Legal Opinion

Murray v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1928No. Appeal, 232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Jennie Murray and her husband, Robert E. Murray, sued to recover for injuries sustained by the former as a result of alleged negligence on the part of the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. The statement of claim asserts that the injury was caused by the step of one of defendant’s trolleys not being in proper position when Mrs. Murray attempted to board the car. She testified that the car was equipped with a folding step which closed up when the door shut and fell into place for use by passengers when the door was opened; that, looking straight ahead, she put a foot on the step,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alan Porter Lee, Inc. v. Du-Rite Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. LenzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  3. Acton v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore LinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Dixon v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Lawton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API