Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Ortega
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 2000No. 1998-2543PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 522.] MARSHALL, APPELLEE, v. ORTEGA, APPELLANT. [Cite as Marshall v. Ortega,
2000-Ohio-481.] Medical malpractice—Where party complies with R.C. 2305.11(B)(1) and sends multiple written notices of intent to sue prior to the expiration of the one- year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.11(B)(1), the one- hundred-eighty-day period begins to run from the date the last notice is received by the potential defendants. Where a party complies with the requirements of R.C. 2305.11(B)(1) and sends multiple written…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Woods v. DuttaOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Edens v. Barberton Area Family Practice CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Marshall v. OrtegaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. St. Luke's HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Home Sales, Inc. of Delaware v. BurrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ryan v. Randolph, Unpublished Decision (1-30-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004