Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Ortega

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2000No. Nos. 98-2543 and 98-2610PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue certified for our review is: “Where a party timely files more than one statutory notice of intent to sue in accordance with R.C. 2305.11(B)(1), does the statute of limitations for medical malpractice bar prosecution of an action for malpractice commenced within 180 days of the latest of these notices?” We answer this question in the negative and affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

Generally, a medical malpractice lawsuit must be brought within one year after the cause of action accrues. R.C. 2305.11(B)(1). However, R.C. 2305.11(B)(1) also provides…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woods v. DuttaOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Edens v. Barberton Area Family Practice CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Johnson v. St. Luke's HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. GuernseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Amadasu v. O'NealOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Grandillo v. MontesclarosOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Herrick v. ZaghloolOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Szwarga v. Riverside Methodist Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API