Legal Opinion
Intesa Sanpaolo v. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 2013No. 12 Civ. 2683(RWS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Intesa Sanpaolo, S.p.A., (“Intesa” or “Plaintiff’) filed an amended complaint on June 22, 2012, (the “FAC”) asserting federal securities fraud claims and state law claims for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud and civil conspiracy against the following defendants: (i) Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Credit Agricole Securities (U.S.A.) Inc. (collectively, “Calyon”1); (ii) The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC (“Putnam”); and (iii) Magnetar Capital LLC, Magnetar Financial LLC and Magnetar Capital Fund, LP (collectively, “Magnetar”, and along…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- ECA, Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chicago v. JP Morgan Chase Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arco Capital Corporations Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- 7 W. 57th St. Realty Co. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Colbert v. Rio Tinto PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Space Coast Credit Union v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Arco Capital Corp. v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.