Legal Opinion

Arco Capital Corp. v. Deutsche Bank AG

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 27, 2013No. 12 Civ. 7270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*299 OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Deutsche Bank AG (“Deutsche Bank” or “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Rule 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (the “First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”) of Arco Capital Corporation Ltd. (“Arco” or “Plaintiff’). Upon the conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted and the FAC is dismissed with prejudice.

Prior Proceedings

This action was commenced on September 27, 2013. On December 3, Deutsche Bank moved to dismiss the original Complaint. This motion…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gavin/Solmonese LLC v. D'Arnaud-TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Martinek v. AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API