Legal Opinion
Marshel v. Hochberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 13, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated August 26, 2005, as, upon renewal, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated February 15, 2005, denying their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must establish that the attorney failed to exercise the skill, care, and diligence commonly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Volpe v. CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Wei Cheng Chang v. PiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Perks v. Lauto & GarabedianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kozmol v. Law Firm of RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Albin v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quantum Corporate Funding, Ltd. v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Rosenbaum v. Sheresky Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rosenbaum v. Sheresky Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012