Legal Opinion
Kozmol v. Law Firm of Rothenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 1997PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated July 15, 1996, as denied their motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiffs were involved in an automobile accident with Antoinette Mantone. In October of 1990 the plaintiffs retained the defendant law firm (hereinafter the Rothenberg firm), to represent them in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Platt v. PortnoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Andrews Beverage Distributor, Inc. v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- L.I.C. Commercial Corp. v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- C & F Pollution Control, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pellegrino v. FileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Perks v. Lauto & GarabedianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Mitchell v. Schain, Fursel & Burney, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Katz v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Albin v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.