Legal Opinion
IM PARTNERS v. Debit Direct Ltd.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 2005No. Civ.A. 304CV1651JCHPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DKT. NOS. 28 and 30]
HALL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, IM Partners and its general partner Daniel E. Marino, bring this action against defendants Debit Direct Limited (“Debit Direct”), Jack O’Halloran, David Butterworth, Michael Kelly, Skanco Business Systems Limited (“Skanco”), Barry Kennedy, Restart Limited (“Restart”), Ian Lloyd, Andrew Kermode, Domicilium (IOM) Limited, John Allen, and Patrick Walsh, alleging violations of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and various state law claims. 1 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Brown-Thomas v. HynieDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Lentini v. FIDELITY NAT. TITLE INS. CO. NEW YORKDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- DeNuzzo v. Yale New Haven HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Lee v. Enterprise Leasing Co.-West, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.