Legal Opinion

Phelan v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1959No. 50-57; No. 51-57; No. 34-57; No. 47-57; No. 131-57; No. 132-57; No. 167-57; No. 178-57; No. 424-57PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

These are suits by nine plaintiffs, commissioned officers of the Eegular Army whose military services began prior to November 12, 1918, and who were retired for physical disability. After some years on the retired list, they were recalled to active duty for varying periods and later again retired. Plaintiffs now seek to recover under the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802, the difference between the disability retired pay computed with longevity credit for inactive service on the retired list and the retirement benefits which they have been paid, computed without such longevity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Seliga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Harrington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aflague v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. J. Moran McGrath and Marion B. McGrath as Sole Heirs and Successors to the Property of James G. McGrath Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Akol v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Emilio Akol (Clinton M. Stanford, No. 27) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Juan S. Aflague (Paul F. Forster, No. 13) v. The United States. Rush C. Cobb, (George C. Ellis, No. 2) v. The United States. Frank Briggs Wilson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API