Legal Opinion

Akol v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1964No. 564-57PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaeamoee, Judge

This is an action for disability retirement pay. Plaintiff is a former Navy enlisted man and temporary Warrant Officer who was first retired in 1942 for longevity but retained in emergency wartime service and re-retired in 1946. He seeks through this suit to make the election between disability retirement and general retirement pay which section 411 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802, 823-824, affords former members of the uniformed services theretofore retired “by reason of physical disability,” contending that his re-retirement was by reason of such disability.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  2. Aflague v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Phelan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  4. Emilio Akol (Clinton M. Stanford, No. 27) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kutz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. AkolUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Chambers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Conroy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API