Legal Opinion

Reynolds Metals Company, and Cross-Appellees v. Julius Lampert and Evelyn Lampert, and Cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1963No. 17941_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKER, District Judge.

Appellant Reynolds Metals Company operates an aluminum reduction plant near Troutdale, Multnomah County, Oregon. Appellant Henry W. Shoemaker was plant manager at the time of the commencement of the action.

Appellees Julius and Evelyn Lampert own certain real property near Troutdale which they used for growing crops, including gladiolus bulbs, bulblets and flowers.

On June 30, 1959, appellees commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah, alleging that their real property had been invaded by gases, fumes and particulates…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Title & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Fisher v. CARLIN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Kingsley v. United Rys. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Clarke E. Davenport v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association and Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Laurie Freeman, Sharon Mockmore, Beccy Boysel, Gary D. Boysel, Linda L. Goreham, Gary R. Goreham, Kelcey Brackett, and Bobbie Lynn Weatherman v. Grain Processing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. Lubin v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API