Legal Opinion
Wilberto Riascos-Prado v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 13, 1995No. 1138, Docket 94-2523PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner-appellant Wilberto Riascos-Pra-do appeals from an order entered July 13, 1994 in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Aan H. Nevas, Judge, that dismissed Riascos-Prado’s motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court ruled that since Riaseos-Prado had unsuccessfully contended, on the direct appeal of his conviction, that he had been accorded ineffective assistance of counsel in a number of respects, all claims of ineffective assistance were procedurally barred from subsequent § 2255 consideration…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Robert Lebern Lucas, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Yick Man Mui v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Tyrone Perez, Also Known as Larry, Also Known as StarkyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Joseph Stancle v. Ivan ClayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.