Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. McArthur

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1939No. 28576PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff in error brought this action in the district court of Oklahoma county against defendants in error to recover damages for breach of contract to drill an oil and gas well. The parties in error will be designated as plaintiff and defendants, respectively, or by name.

Demurrers to plaintiff’s evidence were sustained and judgment rendered for defendants dismissing the action.

The evidence as produced under the issues discloses that on May 1, 1930, J. C. Pearson executed an oil and gas lease covering two parcels of land in Oklahoma City to one Holmes, who soon thereafter assigned to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roach v. Junction Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Parrott v. GulickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp. v. MollIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Trawick v. E. L. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Kunc v. Harper-Turner Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API