Legal Opinion

Darr v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1986No. 77616, (Calendar No. 15)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.

I. FACTS

The facts and procedural history in this case are set forth in detail in Darr v First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Detroit, 146 Mich App 568; 381 NW2d 769 (1985). Briefly, in 1977 the Darrs purchased a home located in Redford Township. The home was financed through a mortgage which the Darrs executed with First Federal for $31,000. The mortgage document was a standard form described as the "fnma 1 /fhlmc 2 Uniform Mortgage Instrument.” The due-on-sale clause contained in paragraph 17 of the mortgage instrument is the focus of this appeal. 3

Approximately two years after the Darrs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hoyt Post v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Bowen v. LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Nichols v. Ann Arbor Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Organic Chemical Site PRP Group v. Total Petroleum, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
  3. LaFond v. RumlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Reyes Galvan v. Yam Foo PoonMichigan Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API