Legal Opinion

Security Savings & Trust Co. v. King

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. This is an action by the Security Savings & Trust Company against Charles B. King. Plaintiff being dissatisfied with the judgment rendered in the lower court iu favor of defendant, prosecutes this appeal. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the court. Department 2.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNary

Asserting that defendant overdrew his account on deposit to the amount of $394.63, plaintiff brings this action to recover judgment for a corresponding sum with interest. On September 27, 1911, defendant deposited with plaintiff for collection a check drawn by one H. O. Dempster on the Imperial Bank of Canada, Vancouver, B. C., payable to cash for $585, upon the following conditions thereon indorsed: “In receiving checks, drafts or other paper on deposit payable elsewhere than in Portland this bank assumes no liability for the failure of any of its direct or indirect collecting agents whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Midland National Bank of Kansas City v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Winchester Milling Co. v. Bank of WinchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. National Revere Bank v. National Bank of Republic of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. RubelOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Enterprise Heat & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Transamerica Insurance Group v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Graham v. National BankSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
  5. Joppa v. Clark Commission Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API