Legal Opinion

People v. Utley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Newaygo; Palmer, J. Charles P. Utley was convicted of violating the liquor law.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The defendant was convicted under the provisions of the liquor law. It is claimed that he was a druggist, and that he sold liquor as such without having given a druggist’s bond. His counsel contends, in substance, that the law does not provide for the punishment of a druggist who, sells without having first given a druggist’s bond.

The general liquor law is not aimed at the two classes of persons usually supposed to sell liquors, viz., saloon keepers and druggists, alone. It applies to any one who sells liquor in contravention of its provisions. It contains a requirement that all persons who…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Peters v. Eaton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Stewart v. Calhoun Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API