Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Coley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2008No. COA07-645Published

1DissentGeer, Judge

As the United States Supreme Court has emphasized, “[i]t has long been accepted that a person whose mental condition is such that he lacks the capacity to understand the nature and object of the proceedings against him, to consult with counsel, and to assist in preparing his defense may not be subjected to a trial.” Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162, 171, 43 L. Ed. 2d 103, 112-13, 95 S. Ct. 896, 903 (1975). Because I believe the trial court did not make the findings of fact necessary to support a conclusion that defendant has the capacity to be tried, I respectfully dissent.

It is fundamental…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API