Legal Opinion
Conner v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 1999No. 57A03-9811-CV-474PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Senior Judge
Plaintiffs-Appellants Kim L. Conner and Elizabeth Conner (“the Conners”) ap--peal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees the State of Indiana and the *744Indiana Department of Natural Resources (collectively, “the State”). We affirm.
The Conners raise a single issue for our review, which we restate as: whether the trial court erred in determining, as a matter of law, that the State did not owe a private duty to the Conners.
The facts most favorable to the nonmov-ants indicate that on May 28, 1995, the Conners visited the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Mullin v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Shell Oil Co. v. Lovold Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Henshilwood v. Hendricks CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- McCormick v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000