Cruz, Adelfo Ramirez
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.
We determine that questions about the defendant’s name and phone number that were asked in a custodial interview in the present case did not fall within the “booking” exception to the Miranda 1 rule. We arrive at this conclusion .because, though the questions may have been the type that would be asked during a booking procedure, the questions were not asked during a booking procedure, and the circumstances did not otherwise reveal that the questions were reasonably related to an administrative purpose. We also conclude that the court of appeals erred in holding that questions about the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Leslie Ray Foster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- Mark Hoff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2017
- Alexander Nathaniel Brenes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Astin Chavers Clark v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- Cruz, Adelfo RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.