Witt v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
The same being virtually concurred in by appellee, we copy the statement of the nature and result of the suit from appellants’ brief, which shows that it was brought by appellee against appellants E. E. and J. M. Witt and W. J. Harlan, on a promissory note executed by them to appellee May 1, 1910, payable on or before January 1, 1911, for the sum of $1,016.40. Harlan made no defense, and judgment went against him by default, but the Witts, who alone appealed, answered by general demurrer, general denial, and by special plea, alleging under oath that said note was executed by them without…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First State Bank of Nortonville v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Shugart v. ShugartTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Saul v. Southern Seating & Cabinet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Jones v. RitterTexas Supreme Court · 1870
- Bulkley v. LandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Kosse v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Joy v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Peter v. First Nat. Bank of La GrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Jaresh v. JareshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Santikos v. Hamilton-Turner Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.