Legal Opinion

Peter v. First Nat. Bank of La Grange

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1936No. 8214PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Appellee, hereafter referred to as the bank, sued R. J. Peter and M. N. Peter as makers, and Jake Alexander as in-dorser, on six promissory notes for the sum of $2,500 each, dated February 21, 1930, a part of which were past due and the others declared due by the bank under the accelerating maturity provisions thereof. The appellants pleaded want of consideration, and by cross-action sought to recover moneys already paid on the series of which the notes sued upon were a part; and also sought, for the same reason, cancellation of another series of notes executed by them to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. WootenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Cooper Grocery Co. v. StrangeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. First Nat. Bank of Kosse v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Witt v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Harper v. Winfield State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Reagan & GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Alexander Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LagrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Evans v. First Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Alexander Co. v. First Nat. Bank of La GrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Borrett v. Frank Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API