Legal Opinion

Joy v. Peacock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 8, 1939No. 12744PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The following statement of the nature and result of this suit in the trial court is taken from appellant’s brief, omitting references to the transcript:

“This was suit by the appellee against the appellant for the sum of $4,456.55 with interest thereon claimed to be due and owning ás salary earned by the' appellee while employed by the appellant as manager of the Denison Compress, owned by the appellant. It was alleged that the ap-pellee was employed as such manager of the Compress on February 1st, 1927 and that he continued in the employ of the appellant until the 15th day of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City of Abilene v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Stone v. MorrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Morriss v. HesseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Texarkana & F. S. Ry. Co. v. BrinkmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Long v. ForbesWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Beck v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Texas Power & Light Co. v. Doering Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Kramer v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. McBurnett v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API