Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Alpha Telcom, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 7, 2002No. Civil Action CV 01-1283 PAPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brings this action against Paul S. Rubera (Rubera), alleging he violated the securities registration provisions and antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, and the antifraud provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Following a bench trial on the merits of this case, I now issue my findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). 1
FINDINGS OF FACT
A. Introduction
Rubera is the sole owner of Alpha Tel-com, Inc. (Alpha). Alpha started in 1986…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CalvoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. Rubera, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. RuberaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.