Legal Opinion

Humiston v. Hook

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1948No. Civ. 16070PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

Defendant Elmer G. Hook appeals from a judgment for damages for the loss of plaintiffs’ property through fire allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant. Plaintiffs, copartners, doing business as M. E. Gray Company, maintain a place of business in Huntington Park, where they sell pipe, plumbing supplies and other materials. Defendant operates a machine shop next door. The building, 50 feet in width, was occupied in part by both parties, 40 feet of it by defendant and 10 feet by plaintiff, a partition separating the two portions of the room, and plaintiffs’ business extended onto other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mirich v. BalsingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Johnson v. Western Air Express Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Olsen v. IvancevicMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Talizin v. Oak Creek Riding ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. In Re Spoya's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Comstock v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API