Humiston v. Hook
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.
Defendant Elmer G. Hook appeals from a judgment for damages for the loss of plaintiffs’ property through fire allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant. Plaintiffs, copartners, doing business as M. E. Gray Company, maintain a place of business in Huntington Park, where they sell pipe, plumbing supplies and other materials. Defendant operates a machine shop next door. The building, 50 feet in width, was occupied in part by both parties, 40 feet of it by defendant and 10 feet by plaintiff, a partition separating the two portions of the room, and plaintiffs’ business extended onto other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Mirich v. BalsingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Johnson v. Western Air Express Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Olsen v. IvancevicMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Talizin v. Oak Creek Riding ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- In Re Spoya's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Comstock v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.