Legal Opinion

State v. Albano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 1981No. 80-63PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to suppress tangible evidence seized during a warrantless search of his person and a vehicle following his arrest. Appellee’s arrest and the subsequent search resulted from surveillance of the vehicle undertaken because of information received from a court-ordered intercept of telephone conversations. Appellee was not a party to these conversations, nor was he a subject of the intercept. Appellee’s motion to suppress did not attack the validity of the application for or the order of intercept but addressed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mozo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Sarno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. State v. CarlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Brugmann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API