Legal Opinion
Warshawsky v. DiNapoli
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*993OPINION OF THE COURT
George B. Ceresia, Jr., J.
The petitioner Philip Warshawsky commenced the above-captioned CPLR article 78 proceeding for review of a determination by the New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System denying him unified court officers (UCO) accidental disability retirement benefits. Respondents Thomas P DiNapoli, New York State Comptroller, and the New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System (hereinafter the Retirement System) oppose the petition, seeking its dismissal.1
Petitioner began his employment with the New York State court system in November 1979.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sutka v. ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n v. BeekmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Senior Care Services, Inc. v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Warshawsky v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010