Legal Opinion

Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n v. Beekman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1981PublishedCited by 66 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wachtler, J.

The question in these cases is whether section 207-k of the General Municipal Law, often called the “heart bill”, establishes a presumption that a disabling or fatal heart condition suffered by a New York City policeman or fireman was accidentally sustained as a result of his employment which, if not rebutted by contrary proof, entitles the employee or his family to accidental, line-of-duty pension or death benefits.

The courts below held that the statute establishes such a presumption. The city and its representatives appeal. They concede that the statute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. New York State Bankers Ass'n v. AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Matter of City of New York v. SchoeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Lucenti v. Cayuga Apartments, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Lichtenstein v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Norton J. Lehman v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API