Legal Opinion

Weinberg & Bush, Inc. v. Murray

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 27, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 342-58PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is the trial of an action for broker’s commission. By a contract dated September 25, 1957, a building located at 1801 K Street N. W., in Washington, D. C., was sold by the defendant, Parkwood, Incorporated, to the defendant Irving S. Lichtman, for the price of $775,000. The plaintiff, a corporation engaged in business as a real estate broker, claiming to be the procuring cause of the sale, sues for a commission amounting to $20,000. In addition to naming Park-wood, Incorporated, the original owner and vendor of the property, as a defendant, there were also joined…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keener v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  2. Dotson v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906
  3. Risser v. HirshhornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Clark v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
  5. McKnight v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Apostolides v. ColecchiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. First National Bank of Chicago v. Jefferson Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. Riskin v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
  4. The First National Bank of Chicago, (Appellee and Cross-Appellant) v. Jefferson Mortgage Company, (Appellee and Cross-Appellee) v. J. I. Kislak Mortgage Company, Inc., (Appellant and Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API