Legal Opinion
Riskin v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 26, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 855-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
This is an action in three counts to recover a broker’s commission. The first is based on an alleged contract with the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company to sell a certain parcel of land, known to the Railroad as the University Tract. The second and third counts lie in tort, alleging interference with plaintiff’s rights under the said contract and a conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of his commission.
Plaintiff is a licensed real estate broker in the District of Columbia. He was accustomed to passing the University Tract driving to and from work in 1959. In March of that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shaffer v. BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Eggleton v. VaughnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. Potomac Builders' Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Clark v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
- Weinberg & Bush, Inc. v. MurrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- RDP Development Corp. v. SchwartzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- H. G. Smithy Co. v. Washington Medical Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mohamed v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975