Legal Opinion

Cracco v. Cox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 1979PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*448OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

The sole issue before us is whether the United States’ right to foreclose a real estate mortgage given to secure a promissory note is barred by section 2415 of title 28 of the United States Code, entitled "Time for commencing actions brought by the United States,” which in subdivision (a) imposes a six-year Statute of Limitations on "every action for money damages brought by the United States * * * founded upon any contract express or implied in law or fact”.

On March 18, 1965 the United States of America through its agent Farmers Home Administration loaned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. IdemSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hulbert v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Ober v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Seamen's Bank for Savings v. SmadbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marcelino Roldan FonsecaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,305 United States of America v. Dos Cabezas Corp., an Arizona Corporation State of Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. FreidusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. Westnau Land Corp. v. U.S. Small Business Administration, as an Agency of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Gerrard v. United States Office of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API