State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress based on a failure to timely file that motion. He argues that his motion was filed before trial, as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-975 and, furthermore, that his motion could have been filed during trial because the requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-975(b) were satisfied.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-977 provides in pertinent part:(c) The judge may summarily deny the motion to suppress evidence if:(1) The motion does not allege a legal basis for the motion; or(2) The affidavit does not as a matter of law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MettrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. MettrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994