Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1990No. 896SC422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress based on a failure to timely file that motion. He argues that his motion was filed before trial, as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-975 and, furthermore, that his motion could have been filed during trial because the requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-975(b) were satisfied.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-977 provides in pertinent part:(c) The judge may summarily deny the motion to suppress evidence if:(1) The motion does not allege a legal basis for the motion; or(2) The affidavit does not as a matter of law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MettrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. MettrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API