Legal Opinion

State v. Mebane

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1990No. 9015SC172PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

The first question on appeal is whether the defendant’s conviction and sentencing under the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act by the trial court violated the prohibition against double jeopardy contained in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and in the North Carolina Constitution, article I § 19. The second question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering the forfeiture of the defendant’s vehicle pursuant to the Act.

The defendant was convicted and punished for committing the following crimes on 20 January 1989 in one drug related…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. MayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. TuggleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API