Legal Opinion

State v. Oliver

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1985No. 841SC326PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant assigns three errors: the exclusion of a portion of his testimony as hearsay; the failure of the court properly to instruct the jury of the charges against him in the alternative; and the imposition of two sentences based on convictions of possession of the same contraband.

l-H

The evidentiary ruling to which defendant excepts occurred in the following testimony:

A. . . .[Co-defendant] came up to me and leaned down and said “I think—

Mr. Williams: Objection

The Court: Sustained

Q. What was [sic] her actions?

A. Her actions were that she wanted to clean —

Mr. Williams:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API