State v. Oliver
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant assigns three errors: the exclusion of a portion of his testimony as hearsay; the failure of the court properly to instruct the jury of the charges against him in the alternative; and the imposition of two sentences based on convictions of possession of the same contraband.
l-H
The evidentiary ruling to which defendant excepts occurred in the following testimony:
A. . . .[Co-defendant] came up to me and leaned down and said “I think—
Mr. Williams: Objection
The Court: Sustained
Q. What was [sic] her actions?
A. Her actions were that she wanted to clean —
Mr. Williams:…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. PipkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994