Legal Opinion

Greene v. Keim

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 7103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by Anita M. Greene, individually and as trustee, and George M. Greene, her son, against S. Lucia Keim. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that Mrs. Greene resides at Scottsdale, Arizona, that George Greene resides at Los Angeles, California, and that S. Lucia Keim resides in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked on the basis of diversity of citizenship of the parties. On behalf of S. Lucia Keim, there was filed a suggestion to the Court that it lacks jurisdiction in that all three parties in the case are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Dorrance's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. WhiteleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. ColonnaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Barrett v. CovertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Scott v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Jennings v. FantiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Scott v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API