Pemberton v. Colonna
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, Senior District Judge.
Defendant, Paul Colonna, has moved to dismiss this action on the ground that diversity of citizenship of the parties un der 28 U.S.C.A. § 1382(a) (l) 1 is wanting.
The citizenship of defendant is not in dispute — he is a citizen of Pennsylvania. However, the citizenship of plaintiff, Bertrice Pemberton, is in dispute.
It is the contention of defendant that plaintiff is either a citizen of Pennsylvania or of the United States, and, in either event, the requisite jurisdiction of § 1332(a)(1), that the matter in controversy be between “citizens of different States”, is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Messick v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Blair Holdings Corporation v. RubinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Klausner v. LevyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sadat v. MertesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Standing Rock Sioux Indian Tribe v. Byron L. Dorgan, Tax Commissioner, State of North DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Willis v. Westin Hotel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Simmons v. RosenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Suglove v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.