Scott v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McGRANERY, District Judge.
This is a tort action in which defendant has questioned the jurisdiction of the Court by a motion to dismiss. In accordance with my Opinion of February 1, 1949, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 548, a hearing was held to determine whether diversity of jurisdiction exists in the instant case. Defendant, concededly a Pennsylvania corporation, contends that plaintiff is a citizen of Pennsylvania, as well, although the complaint alleges that he is a citizen of New Jersey. The law in these matters is not complicated, although determination of the factual issues may be difficult. Cf. Berger…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Greene v. KeimDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Scott v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Berger v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hollowell v. HuxDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1964