Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cowgill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 1991No. 1901290PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted Petitioner Ronald Ray Cowgill's request to review the Court of Civil Appeals' holding that under the plain language of the Workmen's Compensation Act "there is no provision . . . for the assessment of attorney's fees for the obtaining of medical and surgical expenses." 587 So.2d 1000,1002. The Court of Civil Appeals, affirming the trial court's order overruling Cowgill's motion to tax attorney fees against Bowman Transportation, Inc. ("Bowman"), reasoned as follows:

"While we are not without sympathy for [Cowgill] under the circumstances shown, there is no provision under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Cowgill v. Bowman Transp., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Travelers Indem. Co. of Illinois v. GrinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Argo Const. Co. v. RichCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. James River Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Millar v. Wayne's Pest ControlCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. In Re CrotzerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API